Posts Tagged ‘Rules Changes’

Court Endorses Citizens’ Right to Access Government Information

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010 by Sean Bawden

In a decision released May 5, 2010, (595799 Ontario Limited v. Galpin et al, 2010 ONSC 2083) the Honourable Justice Robert Beaudoin affirmed private citizens’ democratic right to access government information. Read the rest of this entry »

How Changes to Automobile Insurance Regulation in Ontario Affect You

Friday, March 12th, 2010 by Derek Nicholson

Effective September the 1st, 2010 significant reforms (Ontario Regulation 34/10) will be made that will affect accident victims and will require changes to the approach taken by counsel, health care providers and insurance brokers/agents.   Car owners need to know of the significant decisions they will have to make in selecting optional coverages for no fault accident benefits.  For example, now there is a basic Med Rehab no fault coverage of $100,000 ($1 million if victim is found catastrophic).  After September 1st, standard coverage will be reduced to $50,000 unless optional coverage is purchased of $100,000 or $1.1 million.  Likewise Attendant care no fault coverage will be reduced from $100,000 ($1 million if catastrophic) down to $36,000 unless optional coverage of $72,000 or $1,072,000 is purchased.   Likewise optional coverages for caregiver benefits, housekeeping benefits, and home maintenance benefits will have to be purchased for non catastrophic patients.

The public will have to be educated on the available optional benefits.  Liability issues may arise for insurance brokers or agents who do not clearly point out the need for these benefits and clearly spell out their availabilty.

Derek Nicholson and Donna Robinson will be hosting a series of traveling seminars in April available to health care providers, occupational therapists, physiotherapists and brokers to assist them in understanding the changes that they may need to know about to help their patients and clients.   Arrangements are also underway to host a seminar for legal counsel in the Ottawa Area.

Rule 20 – Is something more “Required?”

Monday, March 1st, 2010 by Sean Bawden

On January 1, 2010 the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure underwent a number of changes.  One of the most significant of which was the change to the rules for Summary Judgment.   The new onus required of the moving party is to satisfy the court that, “there is no genuine issue requiring a trial with respect to a claim or defence.” Read the rest of this entry »